Simple fact. The United States subjects certain personnel in the military to waterboarding. The point of doing so is to prepare our fighting men and women to what may happen to them if they are captured by the enemy. For what may happen to them if they are on a military plane that goes down in water. Waterboarding has been used as a training tool on thousands of American soldiers for years.
Now, real torture is actually cutting off fingers, pulling out fingernails, slicing throats on television, burning people with cigarette butts, breaking bones, or other heinous acts that could eventually lead to death. Does the United States subject ANY captured enemies to such acts? No. Does the United States subject any of it's own military personnel to such things in an effort to prepare them for what the enemy might actually do? No. That is REAL torture. Pain and suffering to the point of death or actual death itself.
Waterboarding does not kill. Sure, it's uncomfortable. But as defined by our own government, waterboarding is an "enhanced interrogation technique." Waterboarding makes people uncomfortable - for a brief period of time. Waterboarding simulates drowning. Waterboarding is a very useful interrogation tool and has succeeded in getting valuable information and intelligence out of al-quaeda operatives that have saved American lives.
As for the left always bemoaning "we are no better than the enemy if we waterboard!" Oh really. Just because a policeman carries a gun and a criminal carries a gun, does that mean the policeman is no better than the criminal? No. The policeman stands for law and order. He is protecting society. Just as the United States military stands for protecting the United States. We do not go running around the globe, intent on waterboarding people just for the sake of waterboarding. Waterboarding has been used in very few selective cases and only for good reasons. Like it or not, libs, your "ethical" argument doesn't hold water (no pun intended).
So put it to rest.
Ann Coulter made an excellent point on Fox News the other night. Ms. Coulter said that if terrorists were partially-aborted at birth, (the live baby is delivered except for the head, then a scissors is shoved in the skull, and the brain is suctioned out for easy extraction) the left would have no problem with that. But pour a bit of water on the terrorists heads to save American lives, and liberals goes ballistic.
Doesn't make much sense, does it? Then again, there is very little about liberalism that makes any sense.

Recent Comments