DAILY CARTOON click to enlarge
ANDERTOONS.COM TECHNOLOGY CARTOONS

Milwaukee South Shore

Try Carbonite

Funny Stuff

  • Shirt
    A collection of Funny and Zany pictures and cartoons.

Tea Party

  • 100_9374
    Randy Hollenbeck at the Madison Tea Party April 15 2009

Nation Wide Tea Party Photographs

  • Image023
    Nation Wide Tea Party Photographs - I contend that for a nation to try to tax itself into prosperity is like a man standing in a bucket and trying to lift himself up by the handle. -- Winston Churchill

July 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Saturday, July 04, 2009

Happy Independence Day!

As you enjoy this day with family or friends, cookouts, camping, fireworks, parades and the like, please find the time to reflect on the reason we celebrate this day.  We are a proud nation, one where we can express our different thoughts and views, one where we can have religious freedom, one where our soldiers continue to fight for the Freedom we enjoy, one where we take a day out of the year to celebrate a birthday, not “just another year”, one birthday that will continue to be another year to celebrate our freedom, one where we can be thankful for the Freedom we enjoy!

Whichever way you choose to observe the 4th of July, celebrate of our Birthday and be proud to be a part of this magnificent nation!

The Hollenbeck Family
 

Facts:

On this day in 1776, the Declaration of Independence was approved by the Continental Congress, setting the 13 colonies on the road to freedom as a sovereign nation.

2.5 million
In July 1776, the estimated number of people living in the newly independent nation.
Source: Historical Statistics of the United States: Colonial Times to 1970 <http://www.census.gov/prod/www/abs/statab.html>

Over 304 million
The nation’s population on this July Fourth.
Source: Population clock <http://www.census.gov/main/www/popclock.html>

North Korea fires seven missiles and where is Obama?

North Korea test-fires more missiles, says Seoul
http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/asiapcf/07/04/nkorea.missiles/index.html

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31728902/ns/world_news-asiapacific/

North Korea fires seven missiles and where is Obama? 

But hey, we know he thinks Jordan is better than Bryant.  Obama only works on the tuff and hard things.

Obama: Kobe Bryant no match for Michael Jordan
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gDQOJxEcl03N_SN6G7yZZDvnyjeQD996EEMG0


Thursday, July 02, 2009

Liberal reporting exposed...Part V

Who could miss the huge headline on the front page in the Milwaukee Journal/Sentinel on 6/30/09:

"DOYLE KILLS SALES TAX INCREASE"

Funny how reporters Patrick Marley, Steve Schultze, and Steven Walters chose to report on one small item that Doyle vetoed from the fiscally irresponsible 2009-2011 State Budget.  What the reporters decided to gloss over were all the tax increases, fee increases, spending increases, and borrowing this bill allows for.  The tax-and-spend bill that Doyle signed.  Three paragraphs within the story actually do mention a few of the increases.  Yet, most of the  scope of the story is devoted to Doyle vetoes.  Why?

Why not be honest and highlight all the lowlights included in this tax-and-spend budget?  A budget that, when all is said and done, still leaves Wisconsin over $2,600,000,000.00 in debt.   At least no Republican legislators voted for this travesty - saying it (the budget) was too costly at a time of economic distress.  Reince Priebus, the chairman of the state Republican Party, said "Taxpayers will continue to realize the implications of this budget and the governor's vetoes over the next few days and months, but the full impact of the taxes, spending, and borrowing in this budget will be felt for generations to come."

Yes indeed.  And the Milwaukee Journal/Sentinel has tried to hoodwink its readers with a misleading eye-catching headline, touting a Doyle veto of a Milwaukee area sales tax increase.  That veto was one small blip in this overall monstrosity of a budget.

Let's look at what Doyle DIDN'T veto:

1)  Capital Gains Tax Increase:  the tax exemption on capital gains has been cut in half.  Meaning, taxpayers will be handing over an estimated $242 million dollars more to the state.

2)  The elimination of the QEO (qualified economic offer):  Teachers salaries now have no limit.  Even with the QEO, teachers were still guaranteed a raise every year of 3.8% (what businesses out there are even able to do that now?).  And where do teachers get their salaries?  From property taxes.  Look out - looks like those will be skyrocketing, too!

3)  Local Property Tax increase of $1,500,000,000.00:  the state government increased the cut-off on local governments ability to raise property taxes from 2% to 3%.  This means that an average home value will see an increase of $90.00 during the first year, and $130.00 in the second year.  

4)  Auto Insurance Changes:   Wisconsin will now have the highest mandatory minimums in the nation.  This mandate forces drivers to pay higher premiums and includes a new provision that will force good drivers to subsidize higher risk drivers.  Rates are expected to increase 30 to 45% for drivers in Wisconsin.

5)  New Phone Tax:   This new tax will kick in on September 1st.  At that time, for every phone you have, you will pay an addition 75 cents per month.  This new "fee" is estimated to bring in over $100 million dollars for our government.

6)  Double the Nursing Home Bed Tax:  Elderly in nursing homes will now pay $150 per licensed bed - up from $75.00.  This will increase to $170 per licensed bed in 2010-2011.

7)  Cigarette Tax Increase:  Cigarette smokers will be getting soaked once again.  The tax on a pack of cigarettes will go up 75 cents.   Smokers will now pay a tax of $2.52 on each pack of cigarettes they purchase.

8)  Sick Tax (Hospital Tax):  This new "hospital tax" will bring in $854 million to the state.  Yet, who is really footing the bill?  The taxpayer.  Try not to get sick anytime soon....

9)  State Health Care and Retirement Benefits extended to boyfriends/girlfriends of state employees.  -is this really necessary?  Taxpayers are now going to be footing the bill to provide premium heath care and retirement benefits to partners of state workers. 

And the list goes on... 

In addition to increased taxes and fees, so much pork was buried in this budget that it gave President Obama and his many "stimulus" bills a run for their money.   At a time of recession, 10% nationwide unemployment, and business losses, do we really need:  $10,000 for an Oneida Trail Crossing?  $500,000 for the Esiner Avenue project in Sheboygan County?  $300,000 to monitor the Petenwell and Castle Rock flowages?  $500,000 for the Opera House in Oshkosh?  State funds to pay for recycling bins in the Town of Wrightstown (exact cost unknown)?  $100,000 for the HIV/AIDS programs of Black Health Coalition of Wisconsin, Inc.?  $500,000 for a new environmental center in Madison?  study a high speed rail stop in Waterloo (exact cost unknown)?  $55,000 every year to "Diverse and Resilient, Inc. (Gay/Straight Alliance for schools)?  $100,000 for Barron County Restorative Justice Programs?     And the list goes on....

At a time of financial disaster, shouldn't we be lowering taxes?  Cutting back on spending?  Not wasting money on "pork" projects?  Doesn't that just make sense?

And shame on the Milwaukee Journal/Sentinel for trying to persuade its readers that Doyle somehow is trying to save taxpayers money.  A few feeble, token vetoes do not cancel out the many increases all over the board that our Governor is hitting the hard-working people of our state with.   The whole tone of the article was misleading - it was designed to make people think that Doyle is actually looking out for their best interests.  In reality, Doyle and his fellow Dems are simply picking the pockets of taxpayers yet again.  Only this time they are digging in even deeper.  Taxpayers - and voters - in Wisconsin - should be outraged.  When will we finally say "enough?"

Tuesday, June 30, 2009

Another Obama campaign promise...soon to be tossed under the bus?

Buried on page 6A of the 6/29/09 Milwaukee Journal/Sentinel:

"Obama and Taxes"

The Obama White House left open the possibility Sunday that the president would break a campaign promise and raise taxes on people earning less than $250,000.00 to support his health care overhaul agenda.

Is anyone surprised? 

Will Obama face the same fate of former President George H.W.  Bush, who once stated "read my lips, no new taxes" during the Republican Convention in 1988?   Bush went on to break that campaign promise, leading to his defeat for re-election in 1992.  

In the meantime, look out Wisconsin!  Our ethically-challenged Governor Doyle just signed the worst, most irresponsible state budget in state history.  Spending is set to increase by $4,000,000,000.00.  The state will also be borrowing $2,900,000,000.00.  Taxes will be increasing by $2,100,000,000.00.  And the deficit will continue to increase to the tune of $2,600,000,000.00. Wisconsin's economic picture is bleak - and getting bleaker. 

At a time of recession, job loss (remember how Obama & Co. said that job loss wouldn't go above 8%?  well, right now it's at 10%.  So much for all those jobs from the "economic stimulus package."), and businesses leaving the state and/or country,  is increased spending and higher taxes really the way to go?  Does spending more AND raising taxes make ANY sense?

Let's hold our politicians accountable.   Remember these lies, tax increases, and bloated spending programs in 2010 and 2012.  We can save our country - with our votes.

Monday, June 29, 2009

Get ready Wisconsin for big property tax increases

Today, Governor Doyle signed the biennial state budget into law that eliminates the Qualified Economic Offer (QEO) that helped keep property taxes down for over 15 years. Without the QEO, property taxes would have been much worse than they are. The QEO stipulated that local school districts could avoid binding arbitration with unionized teachers if the school districts offered an increase in salary and benefits of at least 3.8 percent.

As the Tomah Journal editorialized late last year, “The QEO operates as both a cap AND a floor for teachers salaries. There are many private-sector workers in Wisconsin who can only dream of a mechanism that guarantees a 3.8 percent annual compensation hike. If teachers start getting raises of 5, 6 or 7 percent instead of 3.8 percent, the money must come from somewhere.”

The QEO now disappears immediately.

The money to pay teachers increased salaries and benefits has to come from somewhere. Guess who, taxpayers???

Another option would be to chop teacher positions. But does anyone actually believe school boards will even go there? I don’t.

It’s much easier to take the lazy way out and jack up school taxes. My school district will almost certainly do that because it hasn’t met a big tax hike it doesn’t like. The heavy taxers dominate the Franklin school board where I live. 

Keep in mind no one other than the whiny teacher’s union was clamoring for an end to the QEO.

And think about this. At a time when taxpayers working in the private sector are taking pay  and benefit cuts, even pink slips, the moaning and groaning teachers are crying that a 3.8 percent increase in salaries and benefits every year just isn’t good enough.

Did you get a 3.8 percent raise last year? This year?

Elections matter. Last November when Democrats took over everything, the path was cleared for them to tax and tax and tax and tax. You will pay for it on your next property tax bill, no matter where you live.

A very sad day for Milwaukee County liberals

They’ve got to be in total anguish, sobbing in front of their Jim Doyle shrines.

How could the big tax and spender do this to them?

They thought this one was in the bag.

Deliriously happy the night of November 4, 2008, Milwaukee County liberals were celebrating what they believed would be another tax increase after Milwaukee county voters narrowly approved a 1% sales tax increase referendum.

The chairs were set up in their favor. They controlled the Assembly. They controlled the Senate. Get all those other tax and spenders to go along and Hallelujah, the final step is big Madison liberal taxer Jim Doyle. 

He couldn't possibly let them down. Yahoooooooo! More taxes!!

Ahhh, but you can’t always soak everyone when you want.

After all those closed-door secret meetings, Democrats in the Legislature eventually knocked the county sales tax increase down to .65%. Not as big an increase as the tax crowd was salivating for, but it was still an increase.

For a brief moment today, Jim Doyle appeared to have experienced common sensinitis. He vetoed, for the wrong reasons, the sales tax hike. He said new revenues (code verbiage for tax increases) should fund regional transit (i.e. exorbitant trains no one will ride), not local transit systems.

That sound you hear are tax-loving liberals in Milwaukee County screaming in agony, wailing and gnashing teeth, collectively crumbling into the fetal position.

Remember what the advocates for this big increase in the Milwaukee County sales tax were saying as they campigned for yet another tax boost. 

I know this because I attended several of their hand-wringing meetings.

County parks will disappear.

The transit system will be decimated.

Milwaukee County 's quality of life will be like Biloxi.

People won’t die, but close.

Of course, none of this will occur, just like not a penny of that sales tax increase would ever have gone towards property tax relief.

Don’t feel bad, Milwaukee County liberals. There are still billions of dollars in tax increases in that budget Diamond Jim signed today. 

Sunday, June 28, 2009

Will Governor Doyle defect to Washington, DC.?

Our ethically-challenged Governor, Jim Doyle, is eagerly awaiting the opportunity to sign off on the Wisconsin state budget.  This is a  budget that includes huge increases in taxes and fees.  Huge increases in spending - unprecedented during times of high unemployment and a recession.  And when all is said and done,  Wisconsin will still be over  $2,600,000,000.00 in debt.

Why is Doyle so anxious to sign this budget?  Well, rumor has it that Doyle is on his way out.  President Obama supposedly wants him in Washington DC. to head up the Peace Corps.  Could this be true?  After all, this would explain Doyle's rush to sign off on a bill that would bankrupt our state and make Wisconsin even more of a tax hell than it already is. 

And with Doyle's approval ratings in the low 30's, it seems as though Doyle wouldn't have a chance if he were to try to run for Governor again against Republicans Scott Walker or Mark Neumann in 2010.  So, in Doyle's mind, why not sign off on a bill that soaks Wisconsin taxpayers, without any repercussions to Doyle?  He won't be harmed.  It makes sense.

From today's (6/28/09) Wisconsin State Journal:

In another sign of the fiscal crisis, repaying debt will take a greater share of Wisconsin’s revenue in years to come. Like a financially strapped consumer facing higher credit card bills, the state would face unprecedented debt payments over the next four years under state budget proposals by Democratic Gov. Jim Doyle and lawmakers.

By 2012, yearly payments on state debt will likely consume at least 4.5 percent of the state’s total income from taxes and fees, according to projections by the Legislature’s and Doyle’s budget offices. That’s 13 percent higher than the 4 percent threshold state officials have long considered to be a reasonable limit.

“If you cross that threshold, that’s a new development,” said Todd Berry, president of the Wisconsin Taxpayers Alliance. “We have been pushing the borrowing and debt envelope because we haven’t been coming to grips with our budget problems.”

The rising debt levels are one more sign of how the state’s financial crisis — the worst in at least a generation — will linger for years to come, threatening further cuts to state services and increasing pressure to raise taxesEven the billions the state is getting in federal stimulus dollars won’t be enough in the long run. Once the money stops flowing two years from now, figures from the nonpartisan Legislative Fiscal Bureau show, the state will face huge budget challenges:

• The state’s cushion to absorb new shocks in the 2009-11 budget would be a little more than $130 million under the budget bills passed by the Democrat-controlled Senate and Assembly. That’s only enough to run state government for three or four days. The state, which operates with some of the lowest budget reserves in the nation, would still have essentially no money in its rainy day fund.

• The projected shortfall in the following two-year budget — taking into account tax cuts and spending commitments in the current budget bill — would reach $2.26 billion. That’s more than any projected shortfall in the last decade except the $2.87 billion shortfall in the 2003-05 budget. If tax revenues fail to grow enough by 2011 to cover that future deficit, state officials will once again face tough decisions.

• Payments on debt would rise from $487 million in 2011 to $650 million in 2012 — an increase of 33 percent.

So will Governor Doyle choose to flee to Washington, DC., leaving  his fellow Democratic lawmakers that sold their souls for this reckless, fiscally-irresponsible budget, to pick up the pieces?  A Doyle aide is quoted in the Milwaukee Journal/Sentinel as saying this rumor is not true.   But remember, Doyle has lied before...  

"Going forward my mind will be open to every solution except one.
We should not,
we must not,
 and I will not raise taxes.

Wisconsin's problem is not that we tax too little,
it's that we spend too much"
 

- Governor Jim Doyle

Saturday, June 27, 2009

Jamesville Can Thank Doyle

GM chose Orion facility for tax perks, stamping plant

Tax abatements and incentives unmatched by Tennessee and Wisconsin enabled General Motors Corp

http://www.freep.com/article/20090626/BUSINESS01/90626050/1002/NEWS01

Friday, June 26, 2009

Does Obama Hate America, Let me Count the ways - Part 1

America’s Economy

This is change we can believe in!!!

Obama’s Goal is Economic Collapse Says Ron Paul

In his June 22nd weekly address, Ron Paul said, “From their spending habits, an economic collapse seems to be the goal of Congress and this administration.”  He also said democrats were now voting in favor of war by approving the war funding request.

Paul stated that the addition of $108B in funding for the IMF was “buying global oppression,” and adding that the war funding bill was as “International bailout.”

Paul said of the IMF, “Along with IMF loans come IMF required policy changes called ’structural adjustment programs,’ which amount to forced Keynesianism.  This is the very fantasy-infused economic model that brought our own country to its knees.
 
http://rawstory.com/08/news/2009/06/23/ron-paul-obamas-goal-is-economic-collapse/


Shirt

Thursday, June 25, 2009

Governor Mark Sanford and liberal hypocrisy

It's a mainstream media and liberal feeding frenzy.

Republican Governor, Mark Sanford, of South Carolina, recently admitted to having an extra-marital affair.  Sanford had disappeared for several days, saying he was hiking in the Appalachian mountains.  That wasn't the case.  Sanford was instead practicing adultery.   He has since publicly apologized to his wife, family, friends, and supporters.  However, as a politician - he is finished.  The only way Sanford could salvage his career right now would be to become a Democrat.  And here is where the hypocrisy lies.

Democratic politicians, when caught doing anything illegal or improper, never seem to suffer quite the same consequences as Republican politicians.  Why is that? Are Republicans held to a higher standard?  And if so, why?

I have several views on this phenomenon.  Republicans and conservatives who vote Republican representatives into office expect nothing less than good behavior.  Republicans do not allow free passes for politicians from their party that go astray.  Morality is important to conservatives and Republicans.    And even though the mainstream media likes to perpetuate the false notion that  bad or illegal behavior is common within the Republican party, has anyone scrutinized some of the Democratic political figures that have done the same thing, or worse?

U.S. Massachusetts Senator Teddy Kennedy killed a girl.  Has had affairs.  Admitted alcoholic.  Yet, Kennedy is still a senator after many, many years.  And now since Kennedy is in ill health, he will be elevated to hero status whenever he passes on.  All has been forgiven.

Bill Clinton had sex in the Oval Office with an intern.  At the time, the Democrats yelled in unison that sex is a private matter!  Clinton was impeached, since he lied under oath - (not for having sex).  Remember how the Democrats in Washington DC. marched after Clinton was impeached to show their support for Slick Willy?   Even after being impeached, Clinton remains the first "rock star" (and don't forget "black President"), within the Democratic party.  He is making millions off of speaking tours.  No shame involved there, folks.

What about Elliot Spitzer?  While Governor of New York, Spitzer had a fondness for prostitutes, which eventually led to his resigning as Governor.  But where was the condemnation of Spitzer from the left?    Was he held up as an example of what was wrong with the entire Democratic Party?  No. 

John Edwards came very close to being a candidate for the Presidency.  Yet, the mainstream media bent over backwards not to report on very valid information that Edwards was having an affair.  An affair, while his own wife, Elizabeth, was dealing with breast cancer.  After much foot-dragging, the story eventually did surface.  It was a quick blip and has since disappeared.  Did Edwards become a poster boy and reflection of the entire Democratic party?  No.

Closer to home we had our own mayor, John Norquist, having a consensual affair for five years with staffer Marilyn Figueroa.  Eventually Norquist left office early, only to receive a lucrative position at the Congress for New Urbanism.

In 1987, Congressman Barney Frank had a gay prostitution ring running out of his Washington DC. townhouse for a year and a half.  The ring had been set up by a male prostitute that Frank had hired as an "aide."    In 1990, the House ethics committee reprimanded Frank.  That was it.  Less attention was given to the Barney Frank story than in 2006, when Republican Mark Foley's sexually explicit  e-mails to male pages came to light.   Foley later resigned after his "scandal" broke.  Foley sent naughty e-mails and his career was over.   Frank, as we all know, is still in office.

Melvin Reynolds, a Democratic representative from Illinois in the U.S. House of Representatives was convicted of sexual assault and sexual abuse of a 16 year old campaign worker.  He served prison time, then tried to win his seat back in 2004.  He lost to Jesse Jackson, Jr.  Yet, where was the outrage?  What even led Reynolds to have enough gall to run again for his old seat once out of prison?

Remember Marion Barry?  He was the mayor of Washington DC. from 1979-1990.  He was caught using crack cocaine and spent time in prison. He was also found guilty of not paying federal and local taxes.  Once out of prison, Barry went on to become mayor of Washington DC. again - from 1995 - 1999.  Today, Barry serves on the City Council in DC.

So here is where the double-standard comes in.  When a Republican politician is caught doing something illegal or wrong, their career is over.  Why?  Because conservative and Republican voters, as well as Republican politicians expect better out of their leaders.  They will not tolerate such behavior.  And the shortcomings of a handful of individuals does not represent the entire Republican Party as a whole.  Mark Sanford was a hypocrite -not the entire Republican party.  He made a choice.  He knew the difference between right and wrong.  And conservatives and Republicans believe in the concept of right and wrong.  The mainstream media and Democrats like to conclude how the bad behaviors of one Republican represent a crisis among the entire Republican party.  That is not true. 

Likewise, when Democratic politicians are caught in wrongdoing, why isn't that described as being representative of the entire Democratic party?  Why are liberal politicians personal failures never a reflection upon liberalism or the liberal movement?

Oh sure, we hear the usual liberal talking point about how Republicans stand for "family values."  And how ALL Republicans are now hypocrites because a handful of Republican leaders cannot behave.  Yet, even though that statement is false, one could look at that statement in a different way.  What do Democratic politicians stand for?  Anything?  Do they have any values?  If they don't, then I guess it is OK for them to absolve and forgive all the Democratic politicians like the Kennedy's, Clintons,' etc. for their reprehensible and illegal behaviors. 

What exactly do "family values" mean?  Is it because many Republicans are pro-life?  pro-man/woman marriage?  If so, I still do believe that Republicans  stand for family values.  What kind of "family values" do liberals promote?  They seem to be trying to determine what a family actually is.  To re-define it.   And they want the government to assist in their quest to re-tool the family unit as they see fit.  And anyone who disagrees better watch out.  Look at what recently happened to Miss California, Carrie Prejean, for simply stating that she believed a marriage should be defined between a man and a woman.  She was trashed by the media and liberals throughout the country.  To make the lefties happy, she should have kept her mouth shut.

The tolerant, compassionate liberals are neither tolerant or compassionate.  They are not open-minded as they profess to be.  Look at how the liberal Obama Administration is attempting to control everything.  They want to control peoples lives.  They want to tell you what kind of car to drive.  They want to take over the banking industry.  They want more of your money.   They want to take over your health care - and in doing so, work to rid the world of those they see as unfit - those with birth defects, the sick, the elderly, the unborn.  They want to tell you where you can and cannot light up a cigarette.   They want to punish those who work hard to achieve their goals.    They are the most judgemental when it comes to those who do not follow their liberal ideals - that anything goes.  Nothing is wrong.  Anything is OK.  Except if it is a conservative belief.  Or if a Republican violates moral values.  

In summary, to really point out the hypocrisy of the left, remember during the Clinton scandal we were told over and over by the media and Democrats that "sex is a private matter?'  If the left truly believes this, than why the media firestorm concerning Governor Mark Sanford?  Shouldn't liberals be defending Mark Sanford at this trying time?

Wednesday, June 24, 2009

President speaks out against Iran!

As the days go by,  the streets of Tehran, Iran continue to be filled with protesters and violence over the recent elections.  And what is our fearless leader, Barack Obama, doing?

Letting things play out.

Sitting on the sidelines.

Watching.

Obama's ridiculous news conference (6/23/09) only served to highlight Obama's own ineptness and foolishness when it comes to dealing with Iran.  No harsh words regarding election fraud.  No real support for the protesters who feel the election in Iran was stolen.  No words in support of Iranian democracy.   No.  Obama wants to watch.  See how things go.  And besides, when he isn't busy traveling to other countries as a rock star, trashing the United States, he is kind of busy taking over private businesses, raising taxes, spreading socialism, spending trillions with reckless abandon..or just going out for ice cream with his daughters.  Let's not forget golfing, either.  In five months, Obama's hit the links no less than eleven times already - even on Memorial Day, after laying a wreath at the tomb of the unknown soldier(imagine if Bush had done the same)!  Iran is probably just a fly in the ointment.  A nuisance.

Well, President Obama, the entire world is watching you and the United States.  And they are seeing a leader who is clueless.  Obama's approach, since taking office, has been to be nice to tyrants.  To ignorantly believe that such people want a "dialogue."

North Korea has been testing Obama ever since he became president.  Numerous missile launches.  A nuclear blast.  Similar activities are scheduled - for the 4th of July (isn't that ironic?).  Right now, in direct violation of United Nations sanctions, North Korea is supposedly transporting missiles aboard a ship.  What is Obama doing? (Besides wishing to disarm America in the form of military budget cuts?)  Following the ship with a U.S. vessel.  If Bush or Reagan were President, they would have had the U.S. military board that ship by now.  Offer the crew asylum.  Enforced the sanctions and rules.  Kim Jong Il knows that Obama won't do anything, and he will continue to taunt Obama and the United States.  There will be more dangerous provocations.  What will be next - a missile aimed at Hawaii?

Iran has shown the same level of disdain for Obama.  Like a little child, Obama has been pleading to be heard.   And the leader of Iran, Ahmadinejad, has  laughed  in Obama's face.  Iran knows Obama will not do anything.  Obama has to wake up and realize such countries don't want to talk to him or the United States.  Obama's passive views of diplomacy won't work when one is dealing with thugs and people who have declared they wish to wipe the United States off the face of the earth. 

After 9/11, President Bush clearly had the respect of the world.  He demonstrated to other countries that America was a force to be reckoned with.   9/11 woke a sleeping giant - and other countries took notice.  They realized America, with President Bush leading the way,  would fight back and not tolerate terrorism, nor others who wished to do us harm.   So what if some countries didn't like the United States.   Sometimes it isn't important to be liked.  It is more important to be respected - and feared.   Strength works.  Begging and pleading to talk doesn't.  Jimmy Carter didn't realize this fact, and it is clear Obama doesn't either.   And other countries are paying attention - and learning what they can get away with.

Obama is no leader.   The American people need to realize that being President is above Obama's pay grade. 

And the President who actually did speak out - with harsh rhetoric and words of support for the protesters in Iran was:   the President of France - Nicholas Sarkozy!   Sarkozy criticized the Iranian regime directly,  blaming it for the brutal response to the protesters.  He also said the elections were an atrocity.   Sarkozy actually stood up for Iranian democracy, when the President of the United States refuses to.   It is a sad day when France shows more backbone and strength than the United States. 

It is also a sad day when the President of the United States, due to  inexperience, stupidity, horrible advisers, or all of the aforementioned,  cannot recognize what a wonderful opportunity it would be to support a regime change in Iran.  Obama's words of support could lead to better, safer relations down the road for both countries.  Obama could nullify the Iranians nuclear ambitions.  Obama could help Iran take its first step towards becoming a democracy.   

 However, now  if a regime change DOES occur, and Obama has done nothing to offer support, it's a safe bet that the people of Iran will remember how the President of the United States refused to speak out to help them.

And just where is the foreign policy expert, Joe Biden? 

Saturday, June 20, 2009

Liberal reporting exposed...part IV "Obamacare Infomercial"

The White House will play host to ABC news on Wednesday, June 24th in what many believe to be little more than an infomercial to promote President Obama's plans for socialized medicine for the United States.

Health care reform is, and has been, a major issue for years.  Why Obama is trying to rush this through now, with the aid of the media, is very telling.  He doesn't want the public to know:  1)  his plan won't work, 2)   the cost will be in  the trillions, and 3) this IS socialized medicine. The devil is in the details.  (Even Obama's spokesperson, Robert Gibbs, could NOT name a country where a single-payer system worked!)   Only if Obama works fast enough, Americans won't have time to discover what is about to hit them...

ABC news is doing it's part to help ramrod Obamacare through.  By dedicating huge chunks of key programming time to Obama, ABC hopes to persuade Americans that socialized medicine is the way to go.  Here's the agenda:

   -   Charlie Gibson will broadcast ABC Nightly News from the Blue Room at the White House

   -   A special edition of "Primetime" will air at 9 p.m. central time from the White House.

   -   "Good Morning America" will interview Obama, with a card-carrying member of the Obama Fan Club, Diane Sawyer, playing host.  (Gee, wonder if she'll ask Obama any tough questions.  Maybe she'll ask how "Bo" is getting along in the White House...or if Michelle has been shopping lately...)

   -   "Nightline", "Top Line", and "World News" will all dedicate special programming time to the President's plans for health care reform.

Wow - with all this expensive prime time dedicated to Obama and his agenda, shouldn't the Democratic National Committee be footing the bill?  Or is ABC generously donating their network time so Obama can get his message out?  Is this really ABC reporting?  or promoting?

Now here is the very interesting part:

   -   the President will answer questions from the audience that have been pre-selected by ABC news.

   -   ABC news is NOT allowing Republicans to offer an opposing viewpoint or response to Obama's presentation.

   -   ABC is refusing to accept paid advertising from conservative groups that want to offer an alternative viewpoint regarding the White House health care plans.  This is unprecedented - a television station turning down advertising revenue!

Remember, this is the President who wanted "transparency."  Who said he welcomed "bipartisanship."  Well, the best thing to remember when listening to Obama is - the man is a liar.  Whatever Obama says, he means the exact opposite.

And ABC news has clearly crossed the line.  This is bias defined.  What ABC news is doing  - working hand-in-hand with a sitting President to promote social policy -  is wrong.  It is usually the type of thing found in socialist or communist countries - where the press is controlled by the state.  Perhaps ABC news is demonstrating that the mainstream media has already reached that point and they are going along with it with smiles on their faces.  Happy to serve the Chosen One.   

Aside from the obvious bias from ABC news, isn't it a sad day for America when the President of the United States chooses to use the White House as nothing more than a prop in an infomercial to promote socialized medicine?  Is there no respect for the decorum, stature, history,  and what the White House represents to many Americans who love their country?

America, this is a huge wake-up call. 

Friday, June 19, 2009

Bike racks on buses

Bike racks on buses: Taxpayers get to pay for ruined and damaged bikes. 

Here's one bike owner who is going to be filing a claim against Kenosha's Transit System.

Bus Bike Rack

Wednesday, June 17, 2009

Iran: above Obama's pay grade?

President Barack Obama has been presented with a golden opportunity to do the right thing.  Recently, presidential elections were held in Iran.  The United States had supported Mir Hossein Mousavi to unseat Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.  When the final results of the election were tallied, Ahmadinejad supposedly won.  Mousavi cried "foul" and insisted that Ahmadinejad and his followers had stolen the election. 

Currently, massive protests have been occurring in Tehran, claiming that the Iranian election process was undermined by Ahmadinejad.  Some of these protests have turned violent, with seven people killed just this past Monday, by anti-riot police or Mahmoud Ahmadinejad supporters.  More protests are planned, and they could take a deadly turn, too.    Aside from organizing anti-regime demonstrations, Mousavi and his followers want a new presidential election to be held.    And Mousavi and his supporters are looking for international support.  Support from the United States.  Support from President Barack Obama.

The phone is indeed ringing at 3 a.m., and President Barack Obama is nowhere to be found. 

Obama has stated "It is up to Iranians to make decisions about who Iran's leaders will be.  We respect Iranian sovereignty and want to avoid the United States being the issue inside of Iran."  President Obama recently elaborated on his position, saying he doesn't want to "meddle" in Iranian affairs.   What?  Doesn't the President of the United States have an obligation to protect the United States and our best interests?  Yes.  Obama took an oath of office that stated such.  But in this case, Obama is silent.  The President of the United States SHOULD be speaking up - in support of the protesters and Mousavi.  After all, the only way to have any chance of addressing the nuclear threat that Iran presents is with a regime change.  A regime change that could come from within Iran itself. 

Ahmadinejad has made his intentions known about destroying the United States and Israel.    Under Ahmadinejad's rule, Iran will pursue their nuclear ambitions in a direct challenge to the United States.  Ahmadinejad's leadership is a danger to the United States. 

The Obama Administration had supported Mousavi prior to the elections - now they have left him out to dry.  All because the President doesn't know what to do.  Obama has a great opportunity - to support a regime change in Iran without any military intervention whatsoever.  All he has to do is talk.  Obama sure is good at speaking up when it comes to criticizing the United States, how come he cannot criticize the Iranian election process? or speak in support of Mousavi and his followers?  If Obama were to issue a statement saying that the United States questions the validity of the recent Iranian elections AND supports those demanding a regime change, he could provide the kindling that ignites the fire needed to overthrow Ahmadinejad.

If this passivity regarding Iran doesn't make Americans wonder about the leader of the United States, nothing will.  Obama clearly doesn't know what to do.  He is an inexperienced, unqualified leader - with no foreign policy knowledge.  And he has surrounded himself with lightweights who do not know how to deal with such issues.  Hillary Clinton?  The wife of a former president who was a senator for a few years.  No foreign policy experience.  Vice-President Joe Biden? - little more than comic relief around the White House.  His foreign policy experience was a joke, too.  Rahm Emmanuel? - a product of Chicago politics with no foreign policy background.  So, who does Obama turn to for advice? There is no one.  Obama's inner circle is focused on socialism - not foreign policy issues.    Obama needs a Democratic Dick Cheney to guide him along. 

Obama has no problem when it comes to "meddling" in the auto industry.  The banking industry.  The health care industry.  Yet, when it comes to an issue that could greatly help the United States AND the people of Iran,  Obama doesn't want to "meddle."  

And the phone is still ringing...

Tuesday, June 16, 2009

Obama's Top Ten Apologies

Whenever President Obama sets foot on foreign soil, he seems to believe that there is something unjust and wrong about America - his own country. And he must apologize.  And the anti-American crowds love it.  And they love Obama.  And Obama loves the love.

Will Obama ever make a speech about the greatness of America?  about all of America's accomplishments, inventions, and contributions to the betterment of mankind?

If Obama was a football coach, would he be allowed to bash his own team over and over, while touting the greatness of their opponents?  I don't think so...   Why should Americans remain silent and allow this so-called leader to trash his own country whenever he travels to other countries?  At least Jimmy Carter waited until he was no longer President before he started criticizing America to anyone who would listen!

Recently when Obama went to Egypt, he spoke of all the contributions Islam had made to the world. Too bad most of them were not true, but the press didn't investigate beyond Obama's claims (examples: Obama stated Islam invented columns and spires.  No, that would have been Rome.   Obama gave Islam credit for the magnetic compass. No.  China was responsible for inventing  the magnetic compass. Obama then said that Islam developed algebra. No, the ancient Babylonians first used algebraic methods to solve mathematical problems, but  the Greeks developed the framework for algebra as we know it.  And the lies continued...  Yet, no challenges from the press...)

Recently I came across the following article "Barack Obama's Top 10 Apologies: How the President Has Humiliated a Superpower" by Nile Gardiner, Ph.D. and Morgan Roach from the Heritage Foundation. I thought the article did an excellent job of highlighting how the President - the leader of our country - cannot help himself when it comes to blaming America for the ills of the world. I wrote to the Heritage Foundation and the Senior Editor, Richard Odermatt, gave me permission to re-print Mr. Gardiner and Roach's well-researched story in its entirety.  Keep in mind this article was written before Obama made his speech in Cairo, highlighting the sins of the Western world while promoting the greatness of Islam...

Barack Obama's Top 10 Apologies: How the President Has Humiliated a Superpower

by Nile Gardiner, Ph.D. and Morgan Roach

WebMemo #2466

A common theme that runs through President Obama's statements is the idea the United States must atone for its past policies, whether it is America's application of the war against Islamist terrorism or its overall foreign policy. At the core of this message is the concept that the U.S. is a flawed nation that must seek redemption by apologizing for its past "sins."

On several occasions, President Obama has sought to apologize for the actions of his own country when addressing a foreign audience--including seven of the 10 apologies listed below. The President has already apologized for his country to nearly 3 billion people across Europe, the Muslim world, and the Americas.

The Obama Administration's strategy of unconditional engagement with America's enemies combined with a relentless penchant for apology-making is a dangerous recipe for failure. The overall effect of this approach has been to weaken American power on the world stage rather than strengthen it.

President Obama's personal approval ratings across much of the world may be sky high, but that has not translated into greater support for U.S.-led initiatives, such as the NATO mission in Afghanistan, which is heavily dependent on American and British troops. The U.S. is increasingly viewed as a soft touch internationally, which has encouraged rogue regimes such as North Korea and Iran to accelerate their nuclear and missile programs.

As President Obama embarks this week on his second major overseas tour, which will take him to Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Germany, and France, the world does not need yet another apology from the President. Rather, it is looking for strong and principled leadership from the most powerful nation on the face of the earth. American leadership is not a popularity contest, nor should it be an exercise in self-loathing. Rather, it is about taking tough positions that will be met with hostility in many parts of the globe. Above all, it demands the assertive projection of American power, both to secure the homeland and to protect America's allies.

The following is a list of the 10 most significant apologies by the President of the United States in his first four months of office as they relate to foreign policy and national security issues.

1. Apology to France and Europe ("America Has Shown Arrogance")

Speech by President Obama, Rhenus Sports Arena, Strasbourg, France, April 3, 2009.[1]

So we must be honest with ourselves. In recent years we've allowed our Alliance to drift. I know that there have been honest disagreements over policy, but we also know that there's something more that has crept into our relationship. In America, there's a failure to appreciate Europe's leading role in the world. Instead of celebrating your dynamic union and seeking to partner with you to meet common challenges, there have been times where America has shown arrogance and been dismissive, even derisive.

2. Apology to the Muslim World ("We Have Not Been Perfect")

President Obama, interview with Al Arabiya, January 27, 2009.[2]

My job to the Muslim world is to communicate that the Americans are not your enemy. We sometimes make mistakes. We have not been perfect. But if you look at the track record, as you say, America was not born as a colonial power, and that the same respect and partnership that America had with the Muslim world as recently as 20 or 30 years ago, there's no reason why we can't restore that.

3. Apology to the Summit of the Americas ("At Times We Sought to Dictate Our Terms")

President Obama, address to the Summit of the Americas opening ceremony, Hyatt Regency, Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago, April 17, 2009.[3]

All of us must now renew the common stake that we have in one another. I know that promises of partnership have gone unfulfilled in the past, and that trust has to be earned over time. While the United States has done much to promote peace and prosperity in the hemisphere, we have at times been disengaged, and at times we sought to dictate our terms. But I pledge to you that we seek an equal partnership. There is no senior partner and junior partner in our relations; there is simply engagement based on mutual respect and common interests and shared values. So I'm here to launch a new chapter of engagement that will be sustained throughout my administration.

The United States will be willing to acknowledge past errors where those errors have been made.

4. Apology at the G-20 Summit of World Leaders ("Some Restoration of America's Standing in the World")

News conference by President Obama, ExCel Center, London, United Kingdom, April 2, 2009.[4]

I would like to think that with my election and the early decisions that we've made, that you're starting to see some restoration of America's standing in the world. And although, as you know, I always mistrust polls, international polls seem to indicate that you're seeing people more hopeful about America's leadership.

I just think in a world that is as complex as it is, that it is very important for us to be able to forge partnerships as opposed to simply dictating solutions. Just to try to crystallize the example, there's been a lot of comparison here about Bretton Woods. "Oh, well, last time you saw the entire international architecture being remade." Well, if there's just Roosevelt and Churchill sitting in a room with a brandy, that's an easier negotiation. But that's not the world we live in, and it shouldn't be the world that we live in.

5. Apology for the War on Terror ("We Went off Course")

President Obama, speech at the National Archives, Washington, D.C., May 21, 2009.[5]

Unfortunately, faced with an uncertain threat, our government made a series of hasty decisions. I believe that many of these decisions were motivated by a sincere desire to protect the American people. But I also believe that all too often our government made decisions based on fear rather than foresight; that all too often our government trimmed facts and evidence to fit ideological predispositions. Instead of strategically applying our power and our principles, too often we set those principles aside as luxuries that we could no longer afford. And during this season of fear, too many of us--Democrats and Republicans, politicians, journalists, and citizens--fell silent.

In other words, we went off course. And this is not my assessment alone. It was an assessment that was shared by the American people who nominated candidates for President from both major parties who, despite our many differences, called for a new approach--one that rejected torture and one that recognized the imperative of closing the prison at Guantanamo Bay.

6. Apology for Guantanamo in France ("Sacrificing Your Values")

Speech by President Obama, Rhenus Sports Arena, Strasbourg, France, April 3, 2009.[6]

Our two republics were founded in service of these ideals. In America, it is written into our founding documents as "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." In France: "Liberté"--absolutely--"egalité, fraternité." Our moral authority is derived from the fact that generations of our citizens have fought and bled to uphold these values in our nations and others. And that's why we can never sacrifice them for expedience's sake. That's why I've ordered the closing of the detention center in Guantanamo Bay. That's why I can stand here today and say without equivocation or exception that the United States of America does not and will not torture.

In dealing with terrorism, we can't lose sight of our values and who we are. That's why I closed Guantanamo. That's why I made very clear that we will not engage in certain interrogation practices. I don't believe that there is a contradiction between our security and our values. And when you start sacrificing your values, when you lose yourself, then over the long term that will make you less secure.

7. Apology before the Turkish Parliament ("Our Own Darker Periods in Our History")

Speech by President Obama to the Turkish Parliament, Ankara, Turkey, April 6, 2009.[7]

Every challenge that we face is more easily met if we tend to our own democratic foundation. This work is never over. That's why, in the United States, we recently ordered the prison at Guantanamo Bay closed. That's why we prohibited--without exception or equivocation--the use of torture. All of us have to change. And sometimes change is hard.

Another issue that confronts all democracies as they move to the future is how we deal with the past. The United States is still working through some of our own darker periods in our history. Facing the Washington Monument that I spoke of is a memorial of Abraham Lincoln, the man who freed those who were enslaved even after Washington led our Revolution. Our country still struggles with the legacies of slavery and segregation, the past treatment of Native Americans.

Human endeavor is by its nature imperfect. History is often tragic, but unresolved, it can be a heavy weight. Each country must work through its past. And reckoning with the past can help us seize a better future.

8. Apology for U.S. Policy toward the Americas ("The United States Has Not Pursued and Sustained Engagement with Our Neighbors")

Opinion editorial by President Obama: "Choosing a Better Future in the Americas," April 16, 2009.[8]

Too often, the United States has not pursued and sustained engagement with our neighbors. We have been too easily distracted by other priorities, and have failed to see that our own progress is tied directly to progress throughout the Americas. My Administration is committed to the promise of a new day. We will renew and sustain a broader partnership between the United States and the hemisphere on behalf of our common prosperity and our common security.

9. Apology for the Mistakes of the CIA ("Potentially We've Made Some Mistakes")

Remarks by the President to CIA employees, CIA Headquarters, Langley, Virginia, April 20, 2009.[9] The remarks followed the controversial decision to release Office of Legal Counsel memoranda detailing CIA enhanced interrogation techniques used against terrorist suspects.

So don't be discouraged by what's happened in the last few weeks. Don't be discouraged that we have to acknowledge potentially we've made some mistakes. That's how we learn. But the fact that we are willing to acknowledge them and then move forward, that is precisely why I am proud to be President of the United States, and that's why you should be proud to be members of the CIA.

10. Apology for Guantanamo in Washington ("A Rallying Cry for Our Enemies")

President Obama, speech at the National Archives, Washington, D.C., May 21, 2009.[10]

There is also no question that Guantanamo set back the moral authority that is America's strongest currency in the world. Instead of building a durable framework for the struggle against al Qaeda that drew upon our deeply held values and traditions, our government was defending positions that undermined the rule of law. In fact, part of the rationale for establishing Guantanamo in the first place was the misplaced notion that a prison there would be beyond the law--a proposition that the Supreme Court soundly rejected. Meanwhile, instead of serving as a tool to counter terrorism, Guantanamo became a symbol that helped al Qaeda recruit terrorists to its cause. Indeed, the existence of Guantanamo likely created more terrorists around the world than it ever detained.

So the record is clear: Rather than keeping us safer, the prison at Guantanamo has weakened American national security. It is a rallying cry for our enemies.

Nile Gardiner is the Director of, and Morgan Roach is Research Assistant in, the Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom at The Heritage Foundation.


 


[1]The White House, "Remarks by President Obama at Strasbourg Town Hall," April 3, 2009, at http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office
/Remarks-by-President-Obama-at-Strasbourg-Town-Hall/
(June 2, 2009).

[2]"Obama's Interview with Al Arabiya," transcript, January 27, 2009, at http://www.alarabiya.net/articles/2009/01/27/65096.html (June 2, 2009).

[3]The White House, "Remarks by the President at the Summit of the Americas Opening Ceremony," April 17, 2009, at http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Remarks-by
-the-President-at-the-Summit-of-the-Americas-Opening-Ceremony/
(June 2, 2009).

[4]The White House, "News Conference by President Obama," April 2, 2009, at http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/News-Conference-by-
President-Obama-4-02-09/
(June 2, 2009).

[5]The White House, "Remarks by the President on National Security," May 21, 2009, at http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Remarks-by-the
-President-On-National-Security-5-21-09/
(June 2, 2009).

[6]The White House, "Remarks by President Obama at Strasbourg Town Hall."

[7]The White House, "Remarks by President Obama to the Turkish Parliament," April 6, 2009, at http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press
_office/Remarks-By-President-Obama-To-The-Turkish-Parliament/
(June 2, 2009).

[8]President Barack Obama, "Choosing a Better Future in the Americas," April 16, 2009, at http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Op-ed-by
-President-Barack-Obama-Choosing-a-Better-Future-in-the-Americas/
(June 2, 2009).

[9]"Remarks by the President to CIA Employees at the CIA Headquarters," Office of the Press Secretary, The White House, April 20, 2009, at http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Remarks-by-the-President
-to-CIA-employees-at-CIA-Headquarters/
(June 2, 2009).

[10]The White House, "Remarks by the President on National Security."

Monday, June 15, 2009

Those Un-American Unpatriotic Lefties, AKA Obama Supporters

Capper seems to display only selective outrage at the American Flag being used for advertisement.  He forgets or just plain doesn’t want to remember the Obama flag!  Obamamania was running wild!

Oflag

Here is what Capper says:

These are unpatriotic to say the least. From www.usaflag.org, a site dedicated to the American flag and flag etiquette:

The flag should never be used for any advertising purpose. It should not be embroidered, printed or otherwise impressed on such articles as cushions, handkerchiefs, napkins, boxes, or anything intended to be discarded after temporary use. Advertising signs should not be attached to the staff or halyard
Why do they hate this country so much that they would desecrate the flag like that?

http://cognidissidence.blogspot.com/2009/06/unpatriotic-tea-baggers.html

Yes Capper, why did the left hate and still does to do this to the flag.  Still using the ‘teabaggers’.

Sunday, June 14, 2009

Liberal reporting exposed, part III

A few days ago,  President Obama visited Green Bay to tout his socialized medicine plans for America.   Of course the media didn't report his agenda in those exact words, since they know most Americans wouldn't like to hear the truth.  And Obama denies that he favors socialized medicine.  (Rule of thumb when listening to Obama:  Obama does the exact opposite of what he says and his words don't mean much.  He is a liar.  If you remember those simple guidelines when hearing future Obama speeches, you'll know exactly what Obama means.)

Our Milwaukee Journal/Sentinel dedicated several pages of their Friday, June 12th paper to Obama's appearance.  Obama's health care plan sounds good!  It allows people to choose their own health care plans and keep their own doctors if they want to!  (Alright, stop laughing.  Some of us know it's not true.) 

What Obama omits from his speech tells the whole story.  Government-run health care would put private insurers out of business.  People would NOT be able to keep their own doctors.  And even Canada and the U.K. are trying to dissuade America from socialized medicine!  They know it doesn't work.  They know the quality of care is abysmal.  They know the waiting lists for simple operations can go on for years.   And if America  followed the Canadians and Europeans into socialized medicine, they know they wouldn't be able to come to America anymore for the best health care - you know, the kind they cannot get in their own countries...

Enough about what Obama does not include in his speeches (the truth). Let's get on to what our own Milwaukee Journal/Sentinel chose to leave out of  the newspaper.  What the liberal journalists did NOT want to tell their readers about Mr. Obama's visit.  When the Obama Magical Mystery Tour pulled into Green Bay on June 11th, there were 1,000 (yes, 1,000 - the same amount of people who attended Obama's speech!) protesters lined up all along Obama's route to the Green Bay Southwest High School Gymnasium

At least the Sheboygan Press saw fit to report on the demonstrators:

 http://www.sheboyganpress.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/200906120402/SHE0101/906120401

(Now just imagine if President Bush had been in town.  If five protesters had shown up, it would have been front page news.   The press wouldn't have ignored them, the way the "unbiased" reporters at the Journal/Sentinel did.  A picture probably would have accompanied the expected anti-Bush article.)

 In all the glowing reports about Obama's visit, did we hear from the Journal/Sentinel about any of the people holding up signs reading  "Socialism is wrong" and  "Free health care is not free - we'll all pay?"   Did we  hear about how well-behaved the protesters were?  How their concerns are actually valid?   Were the protesters asked any questions by Journal/Sentinel reporters?  Were any photos of the protesters taken?  No.  Our paper decided that the protesters were not newsworthy.  Remember, many times biases are reflected in what stories papers and the news media decide NOT to report on.  Here, the bias is indefensible.  The card-carrying members of the Barry O. Fan Club  at the Journal/Sentinel should be ashamed of themselves. 

However, our paper did decide to run a cutesy story about how Mr. Obama wrote an "absence excused" note for a 12 year old girl who skipped school to see him....

Green Bay Sets Coldest Day Record

In Green Bay, Wisconsin, the temperature beat a record low. The lowest temperature for June 6 was set to 53 degree Fahrenheit in 1943.  On June 6, 2009, the temperature topped at 52 degrees Fahrenheit at 9:50am.

Other record-breaking temperatures across Wisconsin include (all set in 1935): Manitowoc, Stevens Point, Wisconsin Rapids, Marshfield, and Merrill.
 
http://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/article/20090606/GPG0101/90606042/1261/GPG05/Weather++Record+temperature+set+in+Green+Bay+Saturday


Global warming!

Saturday, June 13, 2009

The Classy Left

Could not get this comment posted on Zach’s site even as smaller ones.  Kept saying it was spam.  So I posted it here.


Zach just keep defending and deflecting the left’s attacks like Letterman and Wanda Sykes' tasteless performance at the White House Correspondents' Dinner.  Classy aren’t they?

Yeah, and that time Olbermann mutilated and cackled about destroying the Ann Coulter doll on the air was just a joke, right?

Conveniently ignored the fact that ugly attacks on Chelsea Clinton's looks were made by Saturday Night Live when one of the show's lead writers was AL FRANKEN!

Hypocrisy?  Absolutely!

Comparing Chelsea to a dog in a comedy bit and don't forget the SNL skit where Chris Farley was in drag as Chelsea don't really compare to a "joke" about Palin's daughter being RAPED by a A-Rod in Yankee Stadium.  Letterman is despicable and his comments not only crossed the line but ended in the next county. The lack of any outcry from the left only goes to show what you all are made of......

"Since when is "knocked up" analogous to rape” If the girl is under the age of consent, then is that not rape?  Yes, that would be rape.  Seems to me the left likes to poke fun of rape with Palin.  Has this subject come up before?

Then you have the after the fact defense of "But Letterman was referencing Bristol Palin, who was impregnated via consensual sex" Willow was the one at the game.  Statutory Rape is Rape.  There is no excuse for Letterman's hate.

So, this is the classic "Clown nose on/clown nose off take me seriously" line Letterman/Stewart/Colbert love to use.  When they attack somebody that gets approval from the left, it's "cool", "funny", "edgy", "hip".  Same when they attack somebody politically and demand to be taken seriously, we all are supposed to listen to them and take them as sage pundits.  But let a joke backfire, then they "are just comedians"?

Oh yeah then the joke was about parenting right?  When a teenager in this country becomes pregnant according to some posters here, it is because of bad parenting??  Joe Biden’s daughter is a serious drug abuser, by your standards here he has been a bad parent.  Al Gore’s son was arrested numerous times for drugs; perhaps Al was showing his son the wrong green.  Is Al a lousy parent too?  Or is it just conservative parents whose children get in trouble that are lousy parents?  I'm sure every poster here has raised angels right?

Also when they made fun of the ugliness of Helen Thomas most of you here went crazy but it's ok to smear a teenager and a child barely in puberty about being molested by Eliot Spitzer?  I think ALL the children are off limits, period!

Even when Chelsea Clinton was campaigning for her mom at 30 years old there was outrage at David Schuster saying she was pimped out.  Joe Biden has been an outspoken representative for drug abuse has he not?  And yes Al Gore goes around saying if we don't listen to his bull snit we are all doomed.  Can't anyone here admit that what Letterman said was wrong?  Why go after the kids?  All kids make mistakes no matter what political persuasion their parents are.  What difference does the politics make?  THERE KIDS!!!! 
Now on to Rush….Again, false information.  Just believe the Al Franken version!

Rush did not hold up any picture.  Once again, for those who are just too lazy to investigate matters for themselves before allowing themselves to be force fed lies and misinformation or who really don't care about the truth and wish to be the vectors that spread propaganda and outright lies, here is the link once again:

http://lyingliar.com/?p=17

A technician flashed upon a screen a picture of Chelsea Clinton when Rush gave the punch line.  He immediately pointed out the mistake and apologized most profusely.

On his TV show in 1992, a few days after the Presidential election, Rush Limbaugh was reviewing In/Out lists (a popular fad at the time):

In today’s New York Daily News right here… it’s the obligatory in-out list.  Every time there’s a massive change somewhere, people are in, people are out.  I’m now out.  It says about me on here, Rush Limbaugh, loud-mouthed conservative and Bush favorite.  He’s out.

Rush commented that most of the other things on the days’ list were not funny, but that “one of them in particular” was.  Rush quoted from the David Hinckley article

“In: A cute kid in the White House.  Out: Cute dog in the White House.”

Could– could we see the cute kid?  Let’s take a look at– see who is the cute kid in the White House.

A picture of the “cute dog” (Millie) appeared on the screen instead of the “cute kid” (Chelsea).

Rush immediately said

No, no, no.  That’s not the kid.

Then a picture of Chelsea Clinton came on the screen and Rush said

That’s– that’s the kid.

Rush apologized several times and told a story about how he had learned early in his career the importance of not making fun of someone’s appearance.  He then apologized again and said

I’m– I hope you will forgive me.  I’m fatigued.  I’m tired…

Before breaking to a commercial, Rush asked the audience what he could do to make amends for the incident and, in an odd, spontaneous joke, proceeded to spank himself.

Was Rush trying to make the most of a mistake, or was the whole thing scripted—apologies and all?  The fact that Franken had to use a fake version of events to argue his case tells us a lot.  The real version has Rush talking about a “cute dog” as well as a “cute kid,” obviously not a set-up for calling the kid a dog.

It is not an assault on Chelsea, as her picture only comes up in the context of correcting the error.

Franken set up a fake joke, falsely accused Rush of trying to tell it and then complained that the joke would only make sense if Rush put up the picture on purpose.  The question of, “what picture was supposed to come up?” is not ironclad, it is ironic.  Rush replaced the picture.

Rush has always maintained the incident was an accident.  On his show four days later, Rush offered an explanation to his audience.  First, the show played, “Who’s sorry now” in the background and Limbaugh pointed to himself.  Then he said:

Ladies and gentlemen, I’m sorry.  Let me tell you very quickly what happened last Friday night.  There was a new in list and new out list that was published in the newspaper.  The writer said in, cute kid in the White House; out, cute dog in the White House.  Could we show the cute dog in the White House who’s out, and they put up a picture of Chelsea Clinton back in the crew.  And many of you people think that we did it on purpose to make a cheap comment on her appearance.  And I’m terribly sorry.  I don’t–look, that takes no talent whatsoever and I have a lot of talent.  I don’t need to get laughs by commenting on people’s looks, especially a young child who’s done nothing wrong. I mean, she can’t control the way she looks.  And we really–we do not–we do not do that on this kind of show.  So put a picture up of her now and so we can square this.

They then showed the picture of Chelsea Clinton.  She had a displeased look on her face, as if to show that she was not too happy with the mistake.

Rush continued:

All right.  We’re sorry.  We didn’t intend to hurt her feelings.  We’ll be back with our final segment right after this.  Don’t go away.

This apology offers considerable insight into what happened.  Rush indicates that he had asked to see the “cute dog”.  That is not what happened on the show, but is probably what had been planned–which explains why Rush has it backward.  If Rush was supposed to ask to see the “cute dog” first, that would explain why the technician put up the picture.  They had it cued first.  In addition, if they had the pictures cued according to the names “Chelsea” and “Millie,” it is even easier to see how a mistake could have happened.  Both are female names and like most of America at the time, the technician probably did not know Chelsea by name.

As for Franken’s question of why, if it was an accident, Rush did not fix the problem, the actual context again has the answer.  Rush corrected the initial error right away and apologized several times– thereby fixing the problem.  There was no need to go back and re-tape a different sequence of events.  Mistakes that don’t violate FCC regulations are routinely left in TV talk shows, most notably late-night shows like Jay Leno or Conan O’Brien or Rush Limbaugh’s show.

Besides, Rush gave us his reasoning in 1990 after an embarrassing incident had occurred when he was hosting a show for Pat Sajak. Rush said, “Since I as a broadcaster on radio and now on television believe in behaving in an honest fashion, not faking anything and allowing whatever happens to happen, uh, you saw what happened… Many other shows would have attempted to keep you from seeing what happened in this studio tonight.  It happened; we don’t hide behind it…”

It is worth noting that, interestingly, there was an incident– in 1993– where Rush did discuss Chelsea Clinton’s appearance.  Here’s what he said:

You know, she’s [Hillary Clinton] got an interview out in Redbook magazine that just came out this week.  And in it she says that she thinks it’s very childish of shows like “Saturday Night Live” to make fun of Chelsea. And I agree.  I mean, I don’t think you should take shots at a little kid, especially the way a little kid looks and… Well, they do it on “Saturday Night Live” and they’re really mean and vicious about it.  And I think that it’s worth pointing out that the liberals who run “Saturday Night Live” are the ones doing that.  They always say that people like me make fun of the way people look, and we haven’t done that; and-and so she [Hillary] talks about that…

(Rush Limbaugh TV Show, February 12, 1993)

What, you may ask, was Rush talking about?  Well, a Saturday Night Live skit had Madonna making a sexual advance toward Chelsea Clinton (played by a dressed-up Julia Sweeney, the actress who also played the androgynous character “Pat”).  It was outrageous.  The following is from a transcript of the show, which aired on 1/16/1993:

[Clinton gives Madonna the "Call Me!" signal again, but she shakes hr fingers "No, no", and acknowledges Chelsea instead, who is pleasantly surprised by the outcome]

Yes, Hillary had in fact complained about Saturday Night Live, where her daughter’s appearance was being viciously mocked.

As you may recall, whether he was directly involved in the skit or not, Al Franken was a cast member, a writer and a co-producer for the show at the time they were making fun of Chelsea’s appearance– when Hillary complained about it.

So, those of you using it to defend Letterman......you lose.

Updated 6-15-09 - Letterman apologizes to audience for ‘bad’ joke
Host insists confusion came when he didn't mention name of Palin daughter

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31377622/ns/entertainment-television/


 

Tuesday, June 09, 2009

Liberal reporting exposed, part II

Newsweek's Editor, Evan Thomas, appeared on MSNBC to gush about Obama's recent speech and visit to Cairo, Egypt.

"I mean in a way, Obama's standing above the country, above - above the world.  He's sort of God."  - Evan Thomas, 6/5/09

"Sort of God???"  Wow.  Isn't Newsweek an unbiased publication?  And isn't MSNBC a supposedly unbiased cable news network?  Yeah, right.  Well, at least Thomas has finally come out and stated what most liberal journalists believe.  They think Obama IS God...

See Evan's false idol worship here:

http://www.mrc.org/biasalert/2009/20090606031258.aspx

Sunday, June 07, 2009

Chavez Says He Is More Right-Wing Than 'Comrade' Obama!

 Wow Jerry K. was right to use the word 'Comrade' to describe the left.  Just imagine Socialist America.  Oh how the left must be steaming from defending Obama that he is not socialistic and doesn’t want to make America socialistic or Marxist!


Chavez Jokes He Is More Right-Wing Than 'Comrade' Obama

 

President Hugo Chavez claimed this week that he and his Cuban ally Fidel Castro are more conservative than left-wing U.S. President Barack Obama, referring to the American government bailout and takeover of General Motors, Reuters reported.

 

The Venezuelan leader was giving a speech on the "curse" of capitalism on Tuesday as GM was filing for bankruptcy and preparing for Washington to take control of 60 percent of the 100-year-old symbol of American capitalism.

 

"Hey, Obama has just nationalized nothing more and nothing less than General Motors. Comrade Obama! Fidel, careful or we are going to end up to his right," Reuters quotes Chavez joking on a national TV broadcast.


http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,525055,00.html

 

Also notice the EU is moving back to the center and right.

Left-leaning parties faring poorly in EU elections

http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2009-06-07-european-elections_N.htm

Thursday, June 04, 2009

Liberal reporting exposed.

From our own Milwaukee Journal/Sentinel on June 2, 2009:

"Abortion foes fear backlash from slaying."

- a continuation in a line of several stories which have already been published about slain abortion doctor, George Tiller.  14 paragraphs long.  Associating all pro-life advocates with the nut case who killed Dr. Tiller.  Anti-abortion groups are having to defend themselves to journalists and the general public because of the actions of one man.

Now look at  the "Nation Briefing" section:

"Military recruiter killed in Arkansas."

-  4 paragraphs long.  No mention that the man who shot and killed one Army soldier, while wounding another, was a Muslim.  News reports say the man had "political and religious motives."  Think the news media will be asking all Muslims to explain themselves?  Grouping all Muslims together with the man who murdered the Army soldier?  Not a chance.  They didn't even bother reporting on the murderer's religion.

And they say there is no bias in the media.

(As a side note:  President Obama issued a statement condemning the killer of the abortion doctor, George Tiller.  Yet, the President and Commander-in-Chief has not uttered a word about the murder of the Army soldier by an anti-American, anti-military Muslim.  Obama has clearly shown the American people what his priorities are.)

Tuesday, June 02, 2009

"RECALL DOYLE" movement picking up steam!

Wisconsinites are finally getting smart - and angry!- perhaps following in the footsteps of Californians who recently said "enough is enough."  No more tax increases!  No more fee increases!  No more careless, excessive spending!  First came the nation-wide Tea Parties - which helped galvanize conservatives and others fed up with higher taxes and wasted dollars.  More Tea Parties are to come, which should continue to unite and strengthen the GOP and conservative base.

Now we have another movement underfoot.  One which currently isn't getting much attention from the Milwaukee Journal/Sentinel, but has been featured on conservative talk radio in the area as well as Madison.  I am referring to the "Recall Doyle" campaign.   Governor Doyle needs to go.  And the Recall Doyle organization is spearheading the effort to kick him out of office. 

Remember these lies from Diamond Jim Doyle, while campaigning for re-election back in 2003?

"Wisconsin's problem is not that we tax too little, it's that we spend too much."

"My mind will be open to every solution except one.  We should not, we must not, and I will not raise taxes."

"By costing us jobs, raising taxes would trigger an economic spiral that would cost us revenue too.  In the long run -- and perhaps in the short term, too--raising taxes will make the deficit worse, not better."

Now fast forward to 2009. 

Here's what the Milwaukee Journal/Sentinel had to report on Saturday, May 30, 2009: 

"Budget includes millions in earmarks."  by Patrick Marley and Stacey Forster  

The first paragraph of the story tells it all:  "Facing a record $6.6 billion deficit, the Legislature's Joint Finance Committee on Friday passed a budget crafted late at night and largely behind closed doors that included tax increases, trims in state aid, and millions of dollars in pork-barrel projects in Democratic districts."

Here's Diamond Jim Doyle's response in the same article:  "Democratic Governor Jim Doyle praised the deal, suggesting he would use his vast veto powers sparingly."  In other words, Doyle never met a tax hike he didn't like, even though he ran on the promise to never raise taxes.  We are going to be taxed like never before.  Both at the state (thanks, Governor Doyle!)  and federal level (thanks, President Obama!). 

If you, like me, are outraged and fed up at what Doyle and the Democrats are doing to hard working taxpayers and our state- in the face of huge budget deficits, an ailing economy, an unemployment rate that continues to climb, and failing businesses -  you now have the opportunity to do something about it!

As I previously mentioned, I first heard about an organization starting a petition drive to recall Governor Doyle on conservative talk radio.  I checked into it and contacted them directly, expressing the desire to promote their efforts in my blog.  The "Recall Doyle" organization was very receptive and I wish to thank them!   At the time, they were seeking 3,500 volunteers to sign up to help promote their efforts.  Well, that goal has already been reached - much more quickly than they ever imagined!  Now they are shooting for 4,000 volunteers by June 7th.    Once they have reached 10,000 volunteers, the petition drive begins to recall Doyle!  Hopefully Doyle will be out of the Governor's mansion by the end of the year!  (Maybe once Doyle goes, we can start a petition drive to get Obama out of office?!?)

Both Vince Schmuki (representative for WIN (Wisconsinites Interests Now) For the Recall Doyle Team) and Orville Seymer have granted me the rights to use the following information from the "Recall Doyle" website.  If you need some convincing as why Doyle has to go, the following should help persuade you:

                                                  

FISCAL IRRESPONSIBILITY GRIEVANCES

CORRUPTION AND LOSS OF FREEDOM GRIEVANCES

 

§                                 *Doyle budget creates a 5.7 billion dollar structural budget deficit

§                                 *Doyle raids millions from highway trust fund

§                                 *Doyle raids millions from privately financed Patients Compensation Fund

§                                 *Supports massive tax increases to support light rail for SE Wisconsin

§                                 *Proposes uncompetitive corporate tax rate forcing businesses and jobs out of Wisconsin

§                                 *Proposes unconstitutional tax on oil companies that will only raise gas prices

§                                 *Wants to increase the Hospital Tax as a favor to the Hospital Lobby

§                                 *Supports the repeal of the QEO which will explode the cost of education

§                                 *Seeks to limit school choice and is against the successful virtual school program

§                                 *Proposes to quadruple auto liability limits as a favor to the Trial Lawyers Lobby resulting is large increases in the cost of auto insurance

§                                 *Vetoed Voter ID twice in the face of documented vote fraud in Wisconsin

§                                 *Opposes 2nd  Amendment Gun Rights for law-abiding citizens

§                                 *Wants to ban smoking in all public places…except casinos of course

§                                 *Vetoed legislation that prohibit medical professionals from being forced to participate in practices that are against their conscience or religion

§                                 *Proposes to release felons from prison to protect the guards while endangering citizens

§                                 *The truth about the Adelman Travel Scandal - What the Supreme Court REALLY said

§                                 *Six-figure campaign contributions followed by an outrageous deal for casinos?

§                                 *Despicable use of the line-item veto to rewrite budgets

§                                 *Has proposed keeping $25 million in cell phone overtax payments to pay for his wild spending instead of returning it to cell phone users who paid the tax in the first place.

Many of the items listed above are actually included in the 2009 budget that Doyle is so eager to sign.  For example, the smoking ban will begin in 2010.  The QEO is also set to be repealed that same year.  And taxes are indeed going to go up in many of the areas mentioned.  Read on for more information from the Recall Doyle team: 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

9 reasons why we must recall NOW!

If my single vote could recall Doyle, I would cast it in a New York Minute. Maybe, I'm not figuring this correctly, but if Doyle is recalled doesn't that mean that Walker would have to use his campaign funds now to try to get elected? And...wouldn't that mean that there wouldn't be enough time for him to recoup enough of those funds to run again in 2010? I would just like to get some input on this topic.

Two scenarios, Walker faces Doyle in a recall election in 6 months or a general election in 18 months.
FIRST, LET'S START WITH THE PURELY IDEOLOGICAL

1. #1 REASON: Do you REALLY want to give Doyle another year to ruin Wisconsin before doing anything about it? This, to me, is the big ideological no-brainer.

2. The taste of Doyle's outrageous budget is fresh in the mouths of voters known for having notoriously short memories. The longer we wait the less bitter the taste.

3. The federal stimulus will likely produce a small rebound effect in 18 months before rampant inflation and dollar devaluation destroys the economy for a decade. Doyle will use this to his advantage. However, we will likely still be on a slow downward trend in six months.

AND NOW FOR THE (PARDON THE PUN) PARTISAN ELEPHANTS IN THE ROOM!

1. During a recall election Walker essentially gets a free ride as Doyle must focus on defending against the recall rather than a general election opponent.

2. We already see multiple Republican challengers (Mark Neumann et al) that will only serve to muddy Walker's image and drain his funding without Doyle having to lift a finger or spend a cent all the way to the primary election. Doyle will have no such challenger. That will leave only six weeks until the general election for Walker to rebuild his finances and rally the now divided conservative factions behind him. A recall election in six months preempts Walker's challengers by denying them time to build their campaigns. Think about it. If a contested primary is such a good idea why aren't the liberals doing it?

3. The best reason for a recall is to demonstrate to politicians on both sides of the aisle they risk immediate removal for dishonesty and reckless, partisan politics. However, for the purely partisan the reason for a recall election is obvious - it gives you two shots on goal. At worst, the recall is a dress rehearsal for the general election and provides valuable insight as to what will be and won't be effective.

4. Lastly, here is a less savory technical reason for implementing a recall. Recalls are exempt from state campaign finance personal donation limits. Individuals can donate to recall actions above and beyond all state limits.
So, no matter how you look at it, ideologically, competitively, partisanly, or financially, introducing a recall action makes a great deal of sense over simply waiting for the next regularly scheduled general election.

 

So, Wisconsin!  Here is your chance to do something!   Click on the following website, sign up, and work for a better Wisconsin!   We CAN stop being a tax hell!  Let's HOPE we can CHANGE our current tax-and-spend leadership and get fiscally responsible representatives back in Wisconsin government!

 

WWW.RECALLDOYLE.COM

Monday, June 01, 2009

So Is The Left Ok With This?

Obama calls himself a mutt!

Multiracial America is fastest growing group

President Barack Obama, a self-described "mutt," who are having an effect on those who might self-identify as multiracial.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30986649/

That Good Old Taliban Fun

Yes, the likable and some might say loveable Taliban are at it.  This time in Pakistan!  Make sure we all call it Paq' istan like Obama.  Maybe they are taking these teachers and students for a day at the circus.  Some how, I don’t think so!

Taliban Mass Kidnapping Reported

As many as several hundred students and teachers were reported missing in the mountains of western Pakistan on Monday, and people from the same minivan convoy who made it to their destination said the missing had been abducted by the Taliban.

The convoy, of about 30 minivans, was ferrying students and teachers from the Razmak Cadet College, in north Waziristan along the border with South Waziristan.  The area is a stronghold for several groups of Taliban as well as Al Qaeda.  Pakistan’s government, after a month of battling the Taliban in the Swat Valley, has said it is planning an operation in the area.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/02/world/asia/02taliban.html?ref=global-home

ACDsee Pro

  • ACDSee Pro 2.5